DISEASES THAT BEGIN
IN UTERO
We know that a woman must be nutritionally
balanced in order for a baby to be created into a healthy
specimen. I have been teaching in TBA that deficiency is not
as hazaardous as the toxins that accumulate in the body and
inhibit the nutrients. Either way, aging is not the primary
cause of disease, accumulation (from exposure) of toxins is.
The earlier the exposure begins, the harder we will have to
work for our health later on! |
Pollution May Affect Babies' Genes
By Karen Matthews- Associated Press Writer 2-16-5
NEW YORK - A study of New York City newborns suggests that prenatal
exposure to air pollution may be linked to genetic changes associated
with an increased risk of cancer, researchers said Tuesday.
The study by Columbia University followed 60 newborns and their
non-smoking mothers in low-income neighborhoods, primarily in Harlem
and the Bronx.
Their exposure to combustion-related pollutants caused primarily
by vehicles was measured by backpack air monitors worn by the women
during the third trimester of their pregnancies.
When the babies were born, genetic alterations were measured. Researchers
found about a 50 percent increase in the level of persistent genetic
abnormalities in the infants who had the higher levels of exposure,
said Dr. Frederica Perera, director of the center and senior author
of the study.
"We already knew that air pollutants significantly reduced
fetal growth, but this is the first time we've seen evidence that
they can change chromosomes in utero," Perera said.
She said the kind of genetic changes that occurred have been linked
in other studies to increased risk of cancer.
"While we can't estimate the precise increase in cancer risk,"
Perera said, the findings underscore the need for government to
take steps to protect children.
The study, published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers
and Prevention, is part of a broader multi-year research project
started in 1998 that examines the health effects of exposure of
pregnant women and babies to air pollutants, pesticides and tobacco
smoking.
James Quinn, a biologist at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada,
who was one of the authors of an earlier study that examined pollution-related
mutations in mice, said the Columbia study merits attention.
"This study adds to a growing list of studies suggesting that
anthropogenic air pollution carries
health risks and genetic consequences that may affect the next generation,"
Quinn said in an e-mail.
Although the research isn't conclusive and leaves open other possible
causes for the genetic changes, Quinn said, the pollutants were
"a likely explanation for the elevated anomalies. Presumably
there will be follow-up experimental work."
Christopher Somers, a research associate at the University of Regina
who was another author of the mouse study, said, "The fact
that the simple act of an expectant mother breathing might cause
chromosome abnormalities in her unborn child is cause for concern."
Copyright ) 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The
information contained in the AP News report may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written
authority of The Associated Press.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/n
Back to top
Unborn babies carry pollutants, study finds
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Unborn U.S. babies are soaking in a stew
of chemicals, including mercury, gasoline byproducts and pesticides,
according to a report released on Thursday.
Although the effects on the babies are not clear, the survey prompted
several members of Congress to press for legislation that would
strengthen controls on chemicals in the environment.
The report by the Environmental Working Group is based on tests
of 10 samples of umbilical-cord blood taken by the American Red
Cross. They found an average of 287 contaminants in the blood, including
mercury, fire retardants, pesticides and the Teflon chemical PFOA.
"These 10 newborn babies ... were born polluted," said
New York Rep. Louise Slaughter, who spoke a news conference about
the findings on Thursday.
"If ever we had proof that our nation's pollution laws aren't
working, it's reading the list of industrial chemicals in the bodies
of babies who have not yet lived outside the womb," Slaughter,
a Democrat, said.
Cord blood reflects what the mother passes to the baby through
the placenta.
"Of the 287 chemicals we detected in umbilical-cord blood,
we know that 180 cause cancer in humans or animals, 217 are toxic
to the brain and nervous system, and 208 cause birth defects or
abnormal development in animal tests," the report said.
Blood tests did not show how the chemicals got into the mothers'
bodies, or what their effects might be on the babies.
Back to top
MERCURY AND PESTICIDES
Among the chemicals found in the cord blood were methylmercury,
produced by coal-fired power plants and certain industrial processes.
People can breathe it in or eat it in seafood and it causes brain
and nerve damage.
Also found were polyaromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, which are produced
by burning gasoline and garbage and which may cause cancer; flame-retardant
chemicals called polybrominated dibenzodioxins and furans; and pesticides
including DDT and chlordane.
The same group analyzed the breast milk of mothers across the United
States in 2003 and found varying levels of chemicals, including
flame retardants known as PBDEs. This latest analysis also found
PBDEs in cord blood.
Slaughter had similar tests done on her own blood.
"The stunning results show chemicals daily pumping through
my vital organs that include PCBs that were banned decades ago as
well as chemicals like Teflon that are currently under federal investigation,"
she said in remarks prepared for the news conference.
"I have auto exhaust fumes, flame retardant chemicals, and
in all, some 271 harmful substances pulsing through my veins. That's
hardly the picture of health I had hoped for, but I've been living
in an industrial society for over 70 years."
The Government Accountability Office issued a report on Wednesday
saying the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the powers
it needs to fully regulate toxic chemicals.
The GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, found that the EPA's
Toxic Substances Control Act gives only "limited assurance"
that new chemicals entering the market are safe and said the EPA
only rarely assesses chemicals already on the market.
"Today, chemicals are being used to make baby bottles, food
packaging and other products that have never been fully evaluated
for their health effects on children -- and some of these chemicals
are turning up in our blood," said New Jersey Democrat Sen.
Frank Lautenberg (news, bio, voting record), who plans to co-sponsor
a bill to require chemical manufacturers to provide data to the
EPA on the health affects of their products.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050714/hl_nm/chemicals_dc
Back to top
|